Action CenterAbout NCHLAVote TrackLegislative ReportsNCHLA Newslinks
 
     

 Abortion Non-Discrimination Act (ANDA)
 Assisted Suicide
 Born-Alive Infants Protection Act
 Child Custody Protection Act
 Conscience Protection
 District of Columbia Abortion Funding
 Embryo/Fetal Research
 Federal Employees' Health Benefits (FEHB)
 Fetal Tissue Research
 Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE)
 Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA)
 Health Care Reform
 Human Cloning
 Human Life Amendment
 Hyde Amendment
 Medical Training Non-Discrimination (ACGME)
 Mexico City Policy
 Military Abortion Policy
 Morning-After Pill
 Parental Notification
 Partial-Birth Abortion
 Prison Abortion Funding
 RU-486: Chemically Induced Abortion
 Stem Cell Research
 Terri Schiavo Dies
 Umbilical Cord Blood Banks
 Unborn Victims of Violence Act
 United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA)

Conscience Protection

Those who support the abortion liberty created by the U.S. Supreme Court exhibit what John T. Noonan, Jr. (A Private Choice, 1979) calls a “secret moral dynamism” (p. 89) to seek the expansion of the abortion liberty, even at the price of violating the conscience rights of others. In recent years in Congress, conscience protection votes have occurred in three areas (1) mandating federal health plans to provide benefits for contraceptives with abortifacient properties; (2) requiring medical schools to provide training for abortions; (3) clarifying and strengthening conscience protection in current federal law. Conscience issues have also been present in other contexts. See: Medical Training Non-Discrimination (ACGME); Federal Employees’ Health Benefits Plans; Abortion Non-Discrimination Act (ANDA); and Hyde Amendment.

On December 18, 2008, the Bush Administration issued a regulation that protects conscience rights by faithfully implementing existing law. On March 6, 2009, the Obama Administration issued a proposal to rescind the December 2008 regulation, asserting it is important “to review this regulation to ensure its consistency with current Administration policy and to reevaluate the necessity” for the regulations. The rescission proposal was formally published in the Federal Register on March 10, 2009. The public had 30 days to comment. The comment period ended April 9, 2009.

      Briefing Pages
      Other Documents on NCHLA Web Site
      Legislative Reports
      Links to Other Web Sites
      Click here to view Congressional Votes
      Copyright 2002-2009 NCHLA


      Briefing Pages
      Other Documents on NCHLA Web Site
      Legislative Reports
      Links to Other Web Sites
      Click here to view Congressional Votes

      Copyright 2002-2007 NCHLA